{"id":31175,"date":"2026-06-05T12:37:42","date_gmt":"2026-06-05T04:37:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/"},"modified":"2026-06-05T12:37:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-05T04:37:42","slug":"total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/","title":{"rendered":"Total Cost Analysis: Electrochemical vs. Conventional Wastewater Treatment"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_50 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-light-blue ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Total_Cost_Analysis_Electrochemical_vs_Conventional_Wastewater_Treatment\" title=\"Total Cost Analysis: Electrochemical vs. Conventional Wastewater Treatment\">Total Cost Analysis: Electrochemical vs. Conventional Wastewater Treatment<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-2'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Analytical_Framework_and_Assumptions\" title=\"Analytical Framework and Assumptions\">Analytical Framework and Assumptions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Capital_Expenditure_Comparison\" title=\"Capital Expenditure Comparison\">Capital Expenditure Comparison<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Electrochemical_Treatment_System\" title=\"Electrochemical Treatment System\">Electrochemical Treatment System<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Conventional_Fenton_Oxidation_System\" title=\"Conventional Fenton Oxidation System\">Conventional Fenton Oxidation System<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Operational_Expenditure_Analysis\" title=\"Operational Expenditure Analysis\">Operational Expenditure Analysis<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Chemical_Reagent_Costs\" title=\"Chemical Reagent Costs\">Chemical Reagent Costs<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Energy_Costs\" title=\"Energy Costs\">Energy Costs<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Sludge_Handling_Costs\" title=\"Sludge Handling Costs\">Sludge Handling Costs<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Monitoring_and_Maintenance\" title=\"Monitoring and Maintenance\">Monitoring and Maintenance<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Total_Cost_of_Ownership_Summary\" title=\"Total Cost of Ownership Summary\">Total Cost of Ownership Summary<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\/#Decision_Framework\" title=\"Decision Framework\">Decision Framework<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h1 id=\"total-cost-analysis-electrochemical-vs-conventional-wastewater-treatment\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Total_Cost_Analysis_Electrochemical_vs_Conventional_Wastewater_Treatment\"><\/span>Total Cost Analysis: Electrochemical vs. Conventional Wastewater Treatment<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\n<p>Key Takeaways:<br \/>\n&#8211; Electrochemical treatment systems offer <strong>25-40% lower total cost of ownership<\/strong> over 15-year operational periods compared to conventional chemical oxidation processes<br \/>\n&#8211; Initial capital costs for electrochemical systems are <strong>30-50% higher<\/strong>, but operational savings in chemical reagents and sludge disposal offset this premium within 3-5 years<br \/>\n&#8211; Shanghai ChiMay online monitoring systems reduce analytical costs by <strong>$50,000-80,000 annually<\/strong> through automated compliance reporting and reduced laboratory sampling requirements<br \/>\n&#8211; Energy costs dominate electrochemical treatment operating expenses, representing <strong>50-70%<\/strong> of total operational costs at current electricity prices<\/p>\n<p>Industrial wastewater treatment decisions increasingly depend on rigorous total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis rather than simple capital cost comparisons. While conventional treatment technologies benefit from established vendor networks and well-understood operating characteristics, emerging electrochemical treatment systems offer compelling economic advantages that merit detailed evaluation. This analysis presents a comprehensive TCO comparison for electrochemical versus conventional chemical oxidation treatment of industrial wastewater containing persistent organic pollutants.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"analytical-framework-and-assumptions\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Analytical_Framework_and_Assumptions\"><\/span>Analytical Framework and Assumptions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>This analysis compares treatment alternatives for a representative industrial wastewater stream with the following characteristics: COD concentration of <strong>3,000 mg\/L<\/strong>, phenolic compounds as primary contaminants, flow rate of <strong>500 m\u00b3\/day<\/strong>, and regulatory discharge limit of <strong>500 mg\/L COD<\/strong>. Treatment efficiency target is <strong>&gt;95% COD removal<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Economic assumptions include electricity cost of <strong>$0.10\/kWh<\/strong>, chemical reagent costs of <strong>$0.80\/kg for sulfuric acid<\/strong> and <strong>$1.50\/kg for hydrogen peroxide (50%)<\/strong>, sludge disposal cost of <strong>$150\/tonne<\/strong>, and capital financing at <strong>6% annual interest rate<\/strong> over a 15-year analysis period.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"capital-expenditure-comparison\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Capital_Expenditure_Comparison\"><\/span>Capital Expenditure Comparison<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3 id=\"electrochemical-treatment-system\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Electrochemical_Treatment_System\"><\/span>Electrochemical Treatment System<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Electrochemical treatment systems require specialized equipment including electrochemical reactors, power supplies, electrode assemblies, and auxiliary systems for cooling and electrolyte management. For a 500 m\u00b3\/day facility targeting 95% COD removal, the capital cost breakdown is:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Component<\/th>\n<th>Cost ($)<\/th>\n<th>Percentage<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Electrochemical reactor vessels<\/td>\n<td>450,000<\/td>\n<td>25%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>DSA electrode assemblies<\/td>\n<td>320,000<\/td>\n<td>18%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Power supply and control systems<\/td>\n<td>280,000<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Online monitoring instrumentation<\/td>\n<td>180,000<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Auxiliary systems (cooling, pumps)<\/td>\n<td>225,000<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Installation and commissioning<\/td>\n<td>200,000<\/td>\n<td>11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Engineering and project management<\/td>\n<td>115,000<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Total Capital Cost<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>1,770,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>100%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The electrochemical reactor vessels represent the largest single cost component. Reactor design must balance treatment residence time (typically 30-60 minutes for target removal efficiency) with pumping energy requirements and electrode surface area utilization. Multiple reactors in series configuration enable flexible operation and provide redundancy for maintenance activities.<\/p>\n<p>DSA electrode costs depend on the active surface area required and coating composition. Iridium-tantalum oxide coated electrodes offer excellent durability (8,000+ operating hours) but carry premium pricing compared to ruthenium oxide alternatives. The <strong>18% of total capital<\/strong> allocated to electrode assemblies reflects the critical importance of electrode quality to treatment performance and long-term operating costs.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"conventional-fenton-oxidation-system\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conventional_Fenton_Oxidation_System\"><\/span>Conventional Fenton Oxidation System<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Chemical oxidation using Fenton&rsquo;s reagent represents the conventional approach for treating phenolic wastewater. The system includes chemical storage and dosing equipment, reactors with mixing systems, pH adjustment infrastructure, and sludge handling facilities.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Component<\/th>\n<th>Cost ($)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Reactor vessels and mixing systems<\/td>\n<td>380,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Chemical storage and dosing equipment<\/td>\n<td>240,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>pH adjustment systems<\/td>\n<td>150,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sludge dewatering equipment<\/td>\n<td>320,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Online monitoring instrumentation<\/td>\n<td>120,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Installation and commissioning<\/td>\n<td>180,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Engineering and project management<\/td>\n<td>110,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Total Capital Cost<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>1,500,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The <strong>$270,000 capital cost advantage<\/strong> for Fenton oxidation ($1.5M vs. $1.77M) reflects the more mature technology and simpler equipment requirements. However, this initial advantage must be weighed against the substantially higher operational costs associated with chemical reagent consumption.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"operational-expenditure-analysis\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Operational_Expenditure_Analysis\"><\/span>Operational Expenditure Analysis<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3 id=\"chemical-reagent-costs\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Chemical_Reagent_Costs\"><\/span>Chemical Reagent Costs<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Fenton oxidation requires continuous consumption of sulfuric acid (for pH adjustment to optimal range of <strong>2.5-3.5<\/strong>) and hydrogen peroxide (for hydroxyl radical generation). For 95% COD removal from the reference wastewater:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Sulfuric acid consumption<\/strong>: approximately <strong>8 tonnes\/month<\/strong> at $640\/month<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hydrogen peroxide consumption<\/strong>: approximately <strong>35 tonnes\/month<\/strong> at <strong>$52,500\/month<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Total monthly chemical cost<\/strong>: approximately <strong>$53,140\/month<\/strong> (<strong>$637,680\/year<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Electrochemical treatment requires no chemical reagents beyond occasional electrolyte addition for conductivity maintenance. The supporting electrolyte (typically sodium sulfate) addition rate of approximately <strong>50 kg\/month<\/strong> represents negligible cost compared to Fenton chemistry.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Annual chemical cost savings with electrochemical treatment: $637,680<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"energy-costs\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Energy_Costs\"><\/span>Energy Costs<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Electrochemical treatment energy consumption depends on current density, residence time, and wastewater conductivity. For 95% COD removal from the reference stream:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Power consumption: approximately <strong>1.8 kWh\/m\u00b3<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Daily energy consumption: <strong>900 kWh\/day<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Annual energy cost<\/strong>: approximately <strong>$32,850\/year<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Fenton oxidation energy requirements include reactor mixing, reagent pumping, and sludge dewatering:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Mixing energy: approximately <strong>0.3 kWh\/m\u00b3<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Sludge processing: approximately <strong>$45,000\/year<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Annual energy cost<\/strong>: approximately <strong>$54,750\/year<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Annual energy cost savings with electrochemical treatment: $21,900<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"sludge-handling-costs\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sludge_Handling_Costs\"><\/span>Sludge Handling Costs<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Fenton oxidation generates substantial iron-rich sludge requiring dewatering and disposal. For 95% COD removal from the reference stream:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Sludge production: approximately <strong>15 tonnes\/day<\/strong> (as dewatered cake)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Annual sludge disposal cost<\/strong>: approximately <strong>$821,250\/year<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Electrochemical treatment generates minimal sludge (primarily from electrode surface passivation products):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Sludge production: approximately <strong>0.5 tonnes\/day<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Annual sludge disposal cost<\/strong>: approximately <strong>$27,375\/year<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Annual sludge cost savings with electrochemical treatment: $793,875<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"monitoring-and-maintenance\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Monitoring_and_Maintenance\"><\/span>Monitoring and Maintenance<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Both treatment technologies require online monitoring for process control and regulatory compliance. Shanghai ChiMay online analyzers provide continuous measurement of critical parameters including pH, conductivity, ORP, and TOC. The integration capabilities of these instruments reduce manual sampling requirements and laboratory analysis costs.<\/p>\n<p>Maintenance requirements differ significantly between technologies. Electrochemical systems require periodic electrode cleaning (weekly) and electrode replacement (every 8,000 operating hours or approximately every 18 months). Fenton systems require regular equipment calibration, chemical pump maintenance, and periodic sludge system servicing.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"total-cost-of-ownership-summary\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Total_Cost_of_Ownership_Summary\"><\/span>Total Cost of Ownership Summary<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Cost Category<\/th>\n<th>Electrochemical (15-year NPV)<\/th>\n<th>Fenton Oxidation (15-year NPV)<\/th>\n<th>Savings<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Capital<\/td>\n<td>$2,220,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,880,000<\/td>\n<td>-$340,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Chemicals<\/td>\n<td>$82,000<\/td>\n<td>$7,500,000<\/td>\n<td>$7,418,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Energy<\/td>\n<td>$390,000<\/td>\n<td>$650,000<\/td>\n<td>$260,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sludge disposal<\/td>\n<td>$320,000<\/td>\n<td>$9,700,000<\/td>\n<td>$9,380,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Maintenance<\/td>\n<td>$480,000<\/td>\n<td>$420,000<\/td>\n<td>-$60,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Monitoring<\/td>\n<td>$450,000<\/td>\n<td>$480,000<\/td>\n<td>$30,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>$3,942,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>$20,630,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>$16,688,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The 15-year NPV analysis reveals electrochemical treatment offers <strong>$16.7 million in total cost savings<\/strong>, representing an <strong>81% reduction<\/strong> in treatment costs. The payback period for the additional capital investment is approximately <strong>3.2 years<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"decision-framework\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Decision_Framework\"><\/span>Decision Framework<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Electrochemical treatment demonstrates compelling economic advantages for industrial wastewater applications with the following characteristics:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>High organic concentration (&gt;1,000 mg\/L COD)<\/li>\n<li>Presence of toxic or recalcitrant compounds<\/li>\n<li>Chloride-containing wastewater streams (enhanced indirect oxidation)<\/li>\n<li>Facilities with high sludge disposal costs<\/li>\n<li>Operations seeking reduced chemical handling hazards<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Shanghai ChiMay online monitoring systems provide the measurement foundation for optimized electrochemical treatment operation, enabling automated control that maximizes treatment efficiency while minimizing energy consumption. The integration of intelligent monitoring with electrochemical treatment technology creates a compelling value proposition that increasingly favors this emerging approach for industrial wastewater treatment applications.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Total Cost Analysis: Electrochemical vs. Conventional Wastewater Treatment Key Takeaways: &#8211; Electrochemical treatment systems offer 25-40% lower total cost of ownership over 15-year operational periods compared to conventional chemical oxidation processes &#8211; Initial capital costs for electrochemical systems are 30-50% higher, but operational savings in chemical reagents and sludge disposal offset this premium within 3-5&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.12.0","language":"id","enabled_languages":["en","es","de","fr","ru","pt","ar","ja","ko","it","id","hi","th","vi","tr"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"es":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"de":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"fr":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"ru":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"pt":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"ar":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"ja":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"ko":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"it":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"id":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"hi":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"th":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"vi":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"tr":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false}}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31175"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31175"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31175\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chimaytech.net\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}